TUESDAY 3 JULY 2018 | COMPLETEMUSICUPDATE.COM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TODAY'S TOP STORY: Five global music publishers have reportedly told Spanish collecting society SGAE that they are pulling rights out of the organisation as a result of the ongoing dispute over the distribution of TV royalties in the country... [READ MORE] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global publishers now reportedly pulling rights from controversial Spanish society SGAE There have been various controversies surrounding the Spanish society in recent years, of course. The most recent relates to an alleged scam via which certain SGAE members and certain Spanish broadcasters have conspired to skew the way TV royalties collected by the society are distributed to writers and music publishers. The global music publishing companies, whose rights are represented in numerous licensing scenarios by SGAE in Spain, have become increasingly critical of the society and its management in the last year. And even more so after reps from those global publishers were locked out of the society's board meetings. As anger grew among global rights owners, the International Confederation Of Music Publishers called on CISAC - the worldwide grouping of song right collecting societies - to suspend SGAE's membership until the Spanish society dealt with the controversy. Then, in a more recent statement, the ICMP said that, unless urgent action was taken by SGAE's governing bodies, "ICMP and individual music publishers [would be] forced to consider unilateral actions. This may include finding alternative licensing options in order to protect their repertoire in Spain". Now, according to Spanish newspaper El Pais, Universal, Warner/Chappell, Sony/ATV, BMG and Peermusic have all written to SGAE informing the society that they are pulling rights relating to their Anglo-American repertoires out of the society. It will mean that SGAE will no longer be able to license works written by countless global music stars to Spanish TV broadcasters, and likely other groups of licensees as well. The management of song rights is complicated because of the way songwriters assign different elements of their copyrights to collecting societies and music publishers. And because the conventions are different in continental Europe versus Anglo-American markets like the UK, Canada and Australia. Conventions in the US are different again. However, when it comes to Anglo-American repertoire, publishers are generally in control of at least the so called mechanical rights in the songs they represent, and so can unilaterally pull those rights out of the collective licensing system if they so wish. And when broadcasters synchronise music to programmes that are then aired on their TV networks, they exploit both the mechanical and performing rights. European law also requires societies to offer a degree of flexibility, so that publishers can pull repertoire from some categories of licenses while allowing the society to continue to represent works in other categories. This is how the publishers have been able to direct license Anglo-American repertoire to streaming services in Europe, while still allowing the collective to license other uses, such as broadcast. It's not clear precisely what rights the five publishers are proposing to pull from SGAE, though obviously with TV royalties being the issue, the aim will be to prevent SGAE from licensing Anglo-American repertoire to broadcasters, which would then need to negotiate direct deals with the publishers to continue using those works. Though it's thought that pulling from SGAE's TV categories would also likely result in the big publishers pulling from other licensing categories too, because of the way SGAE's different licences are structured. Whereas with digital, the big music publishing firms went the direct licensing route for commercial reasons, most publishers insist they prefer the collective licensing approach for other users of music. So pulling out of SGAE in this way is a last resort with, presumably, the hope that such a dramatic move might finally force the society's hand. A number of resolutions were reportedly voted down by SGAE members at a recent meeting of the society's General Assembly, resulting in calls for the resignation of the organisation's President, José Miguel Fernández Sastrón. He seemingly refused instead proposing a new road map for reform. However, it's feels like the global publishers now see a fundamental change of leadership as being the only solution. Whether pressing the button on the nuclear option of pulling significant bodies of rights out of the Spanish collective can now force that change remains to be seen. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sony Music must tell Kesha who it interviewed in Dr Luke investigation One time collaborators Kesha and Luke have, of course, been involved in a long-running multi-layered legal battle in which she accused him of rape and he accused her of lying about his conduct in a bid to get out of contractual commitments to his companies. The ongoing legal battle is now focused on Luke's defamation lawsuit against Kesha. As part of their preparation for that case, the latter's legal team asked for information about the investigation Sony conducted in the wake of their client's allegations against the producer. For its part, Sony said that the list of names of who its lawyers questioned as part of their investigation was protected by attorney-client privilege and therefore couldn't be divulged. But New York judge Jennifer Schecter, after considering the ins and outs of when attorney-client privilege may or may not apply in scenarios like this, ultimately rejected Sony's argument. She said that the major had failed to demonstrate that sharing the list of names with Kesha's people "would actually divulge legal thought processes or strategy". The music firm now has 20 days to hand over the list. -------------------------------------------------- Long running web-blocking case to be considered anew in the Netherlands This relates to long-running efforts by Dutch anti-piracy group BRIEN to get The Pirate Bay blocked in the country. Web blocks, of course, are where courts order internet service providers to block their customers from accessing specific websites that have been deemed to primarily exist to facilitate copyright infringement. Dutch ISPs Ziggo and XS4ALL opposed BRIEN's web-blocks, getting them withdrawn on appeal. But BREIN took the matter to the country's Supreme Court, which in turn consulted the European Courts Of Justice as to whether there were any issues with web-blocking on copyright grounds under European law. The EU courts ultimately said there weren't any problems and therefore national courts could web-block if they so wish. Following that judgment, the Advocate General back in the Supreme Court said in March that – with web-blocking allowed in principle – judges now needed to consider whether blocking The Pirate Bay correctly balanced the rights of copyright owners and the rights of internet users. That, he advised, would require another lower court hearing. According to Torrentfreak, judges in the Supreme Court last week accepted the Advocate General's advice and told the Court Of Amsterdam to consider the whole case anew. Given recent rulings elsewhere in Europe, it seems likely that arguments presented by Ziggo and XS4ALL against web-blocking in the past won't go down especially next time, but we will see. In the meantime The Pirate Bay remains blocked in the Netherlands as a result of an interim ruling last year that said that ISPs should put up blockades in front of the piracy site, pending a final judgment in this long, long running web-blocking case. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warner signs Kloe for publishing Says the publisher's International Creative Manager Saul Fitton: "Kloe is someone I've been following for years. She's an amazing talent and a high level songwriter so it's great that we've been able to bring her in to Warner/Chappell. She is someone that the whole company is excited about". Presumably buzzing with all that excitement she's generating across the whole of the Warner Music Group, Kloe herself added: "It feels amazing to join Warner/Chappell. I've known Saul for a while and feel really supported by everyone I've met at Chappell. Chappell feels like the right place for me to take my writing to the next level". |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TuneCore allies with Sentric to expand song right services TuneCore already offers music publishing admin services to those self-releasing artists who want such a thing, but will now expand said services. Among the incoming improvements, the company says, are "a clearer, smoother registration process and improved all-in-one dashboard". Good times. TuneCore top dude Scott Ackerman is THRILLED by the development. "We're THRILLED to bring TuneCore artists these exciting enhancements to our publishing administration services", says he. The developments "will help them earn additional revenue and get paid more quickly" he adds. "Our new partnership with Sentric Music is so important because it positions TuneCore's songwriters to have the same collection profile as major artists across the globe and increases their money-making opportunities". Confirming the deal for Sentric, the firm's CEO Chris Meehan added: "Much like TuneCore, Sentric was founded on the idea that new technology could shake up the traditional music industry and make it work for everyone. This deal takes that shared ethos a step further. For twelve years, our admin platform has allowed hundreds of thousands of rights-holders at every level get access to a fast, flexible, completely transparent service. We're happy to extend that to many more creators and rights-owners through this TuneCore partnership". |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEC Group allies with start-up to enable multi-payment group bookings Make It Social will work with NEC's ticketing business The Ticket Factory to offer the functionality for select shows at the Genting Arena and Arena Birmingham, which are both NEC-operated venues. Says The Ticket Factory's Richard Howle: "Over a third of our NEC Group Arena bookings are for three or more people, which highlights the strong social aspect of live events. We continue to leverage advancements in technology to provide the best purchasing journey possible for our customers, so it's great to be working with Make It Social". Make It Social's founder Eddie Robb adds: "This announcement marks a major milestone for us. It's amazing to be extending our reach into arenas and to see our software encouraging an increasing number of friends and families to get together in real life". -------------------------------------------------- MJR announces ticketing alliance with Eventbrite The two companies say that their new alliance "is focused on global ticket sales which commenced with over 25,000 ticket purchases for two concerts in Australia for 50 Cent, and will roll out into MJR's portfolio of future touring events, creative productions and venues". Confirming the tie-up, MJR chief Richard Buck said yesterday: "With lots of innovative projects planned over the next years, a ticketing partnership with Eventbrite felt the right move to support our growth. They completely understand our independent ethos and can provide us with a constantly evolving tech platform that suits our needs and helps deliver our expansion as a leading global entertainment company". Meanwhile Eventbrite UK's Head Of Music Paul Everett said: "This partnership with Richard and MJR Group is a direct result of Eventbrite's continued dedication to the independent live music space. MJR are a highly ambitious company and we are aligned on how we view the future of the live music space around the world". |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meat Loaf planning world tour with no singing According to The Sun, the 70 year old singer is keen to keep on touring, but is aware that in recent years belting out his songs every night has started to take its toll on his health, resulting in compromises being made. His solution is to employ his skills as a raconteur instead, and then employ the skills of an American Idol to provide some vocals along the way. Which is to say he'll tell his audience some stories while 2014 American Idol winner Caleb Johnson will perform a number of his songs in between. Says one of those pesky sources to The Sun: "Meat Loaf is concerned he isn't up to some of the bigger numbers after losing his voice a couple of years ago. He's been relying on pre-recorded vocal tracks for a while but doesn't want to face accusations of miming on a huge tour, so is passing the baton on to Caleb, who he's a big fan of". Said source then explains: "Instead his involvement will be telling stories of how he met Jim Steinman, who he's worked with since the Seventies, and other anecdotes. But the singing will be left to Caleb". It's thought that Meat Loaf reckons that, if the planned stories-and-guest-singer format works, he might also be able to turn it into a Vegas residency. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spotify subscribers score refund over excessive Drake peddling Said subscriber reckoned that Spotify's rather proactive editorial support for Drake's new album 'Scorpion' was so OTT that it basically constituted advertising and – well – don't we pay ten pounds a month to get rid of all the ads? "I just messaged Spotify customer service on their website and told them I wanted a refund since this is advertising and I pay for premium with no ads", said Spotify subscriber wrote on Reddit's music pages, "and they have now refunded my last payment. Complain, take your money back, and let them know you will cancel if they pull this shit again. Money talks. Money walking away talks". Billboard says that other Reddit users then had a go at demanding a month's credit from Spotify as compensation for having to look at Drake's face more than is desirable when using the company's app. Some were granted the credits, others weren't so lucky, meaning refunds are presumably at the discretion of individual customer service agents. Still, possibly a lesson for Spotify's competitors there. Add to the front page of your app a "never fucking play any fucking Drake or make me fucking look at that fucker's face" button and boom, there's the gap in the market you've been searching for all this time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||